Staff at one NHS trust prefer scrubs for their comfort, breathable material and practicality
Editorial
A concerted effort from researchers is needed to combat research papers with no peer revie
There are some simple pieces of advice to follow if you want to get your research publishe
Nominate yourself or a colleague for this year’s RCNi Nurse Awards 
A new survey by Nursing Standard and the Sunday Mirror newspaper reinforces the obvious&nb
It’s good to see the college taking the lead on defining advanced practice, and it seems&n
The spectacular RCN international nursing research conference in Edinburgh last month saw
Defining successful research can be complex. For novice researchers, success may involve completing research projects and publishing in peer-reviewed journals, but for experienced researchers more complex measures of success come into play.
Clinicians and researchers often say they do not have time to reflect. Although we are all busy, taking the time to stop and consider where you are and where you want to be can act as a powerful tool in planning your career.
Peer review is an essential task in the professional publishing process. Reviewers provide a vital service to journals and their expert reviews guide the editor when making decisions about what will and will not be published.
Compared with clinically focused units, research coursework is often viewed negatively and demonstrating its relevance to students can be challenging for nurse academics (Halcomb and Peters 2009).
The mantra ‘publish or perish’ has meant disseminating work in peer-reviewed literature. Digital has changed the way readers access content and has created a need to disseminate work widely for maximum impact.
